Blog

adancingdemon:

somethingfangirly:

abadoom:

I JUST REALIZED SOMETHING

IN THE MUSICAL EPISODE OF SUPERNATURAL

DEAN WILL STILL BE A DEMON

A

DANCING

DEMON

image

image

(x)

Slow clap for the Buffy fandom

Did someone say a dancing demon?

"You had sex with Giles…"

(via sunnydale-ca)

(via adancingdemon)

"…on the hood of a police car…"

(via sunnydale-ca)

(via adancingdemon)

"…TWICE?!"

Buffy Summers (via sunnydale-ca)

(via adancingdemon)

runawayalters:


bamf-fallen-angel:

rising-demon-dick:

trust-me-im-adoctor:

redventure:

juicyjacqulyn:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

hethatcures:

This legitimately upsets me.

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.
So you might end up with more donuts.
But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?
Hrm.
HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.
tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

god i love this site

can’t argue with science. Heretofore, I want my donuts square.

more donut per donut

But then if you’re able to fit more donuts in a box wouldn’t it be harder to grab a donut out because they fit so well next to each other

You can grab them from the hole in the middle.

But is anyone thinking about the cube shaped donut holes

runawayalters:

bamf-fallen-angel:

rising-demon-dick:

trust-me-im-adoctor:

redventure:

juicyjacqulyn:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

hethatcures:

This legitimately upsets me.

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

So you might end up with more donuts.

But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

Hrm.

HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (
R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.


tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

god i love this site

can’t argue with science. Heretofore, I want my donuts square.

more donut per donut

But then if you’re able to fit more donuts in a box wouldn’t it be harder to grab a donut out because they fit so well next to each other

You can grab them from the hole in the middle.

But is anyone thinking about the cube shaped donut holes

(Source: nimstrz, via getthesaltyaidjit)

dvlightful:

i want a tumblr buddy from a different country that i just exchange things with u no what i mean like they can send me candy from where they live and id send them german candy or we could send friendship bracelets and letters and drawings and just anything and itd be rly cute and frick man

(Source: dvlightful, via vivacosima)

stayyounggoprancing:

brbjellyfishing:

it’s so weird how names of old people were once young people names like there were little baby gertrudes and Mildreds and ednas walking around 100 years ago

I think about this a lot

(via almost-always-eventually-right)

"Call your mother. Tell her you love her. Remember you’re the only person who knows what her heart sounds like from the inside."

wow this made me sad. (via crowesmuse)

(Source: pobredreamer, via crowesmuse)

sernacht:

So, I was in the car today and saw someone with the license plate “X0DUS3 5”, so I thought it was like Exodus 3:5 and I looked it up, and do you know what it said?

"Do not come any closer."

(via crowesmuse)

unfrickable:

do not sexualize young girls.
yes, I am kink shaming you. 
because you should be ashamed of yourself
for sexualizing young girls, and
no one’s sexual liberation is more important
than protecting young girls.

(via crowesmuse)

i-effed-it-all-up:

if you’re ever feeling sad just remember that tatiana maslany roller bladed to her orphan black audition

(via orphanblow)

novas-grimoire:

wikatiepedia:

crimsoncamellianeko:

forimuchdesiretospeakwithhim:

wikatiepedia:

from now on I’m going to convey sarcasm over the internet by typing like this

oh wow look how sarcastic that looks

that actually does look really sarcastic though. this is revolutionary

DEAR GOD SOMEONE HAS INVENTED THE SARCASM FONT THIS IS A TIME FOR CELEBRATION

image

(Source: wikatiepedia, via orphanblow)

myutsuu:

thehotgirlproject:

the-gingerdancer:

papayadog:

scandalous

 i will reblog this as many times as it takes me to stop finding this funny

SCANDALOUS!

never not funny

(Source: yousaytheydontcare, via katthedemonslayer)

poolpartypirates:

do you ever get sad that you’ll never be able to touch a fictional character

(Source: stupih, via orphanblow)